Deuteronomy 22:21 they shall bring out the damsel into the doorway of her father’s quarters
Judges 19:2 and his awesome concubine starred the whore against him, and gone from the him unto this lady father’s household to Bethlehemjudah, and was actually truth be told there four entire period.
Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these terminology toward the north, and state, Go Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith the LORD; and that I will not trigger mine frustration to-fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the LORD, and I won’t hold outrage for evera€¦
Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith god, return unto me personally: assuming thou wilt set aside thine abominations off my personal sight, next shalt thou perhaps not removea€¦
Jeremiah 8:4-6 Moreover thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the LORD
They state. –Better, as we say, as presenting a application of the figure. The immediate resource is to Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the return to yesteryear husband as an abomination, a laws which the latest discovery of the guide in the Law (2Kings 22:10-11) had most likely brought into prominence. But there is additionally an obvious allusion for the want images in Hosea. There the prophet have accomplished, practically or even in parable, precisely what the laws have prohibited (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), and therefore had presented out of the possibility for return plus the hope of pardon. Jeremiah needs to bring a sterner role. and to make the apostate adulteress about believe that she had sinned too deeply having any states forgiveness. It could look just as if Jehovah would never now come back to the passion for His espousals, and make their just what she once was in fact.
Yet go back once more for me, saith god. –The keywords sounds into the English like a gracious invite, and–in spite regarding the power of many interpreters taking it an indignant exclamation, and come back to me personally! an invite considering in irony, so equivalent to rejection, as though that return were out of the question–it must, i believe, end up being thus taken. The prophet features, while we have seen, a brief history of Hosea in his mind’s eye, in which there was indeed such a phone call to come back (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), and actually makes reference to they and repeats they in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It surely implies a want of insight into the character of Jeremiah to guess that the guy previously came before men as proclaiming an irrevocable condemnation, leaving out the potential for repentance.
Verse 1. – they do say , etc.; as margin of Authorized variation correctly states, the Hebrew merely keeps “claiming.” Various clever attempts were made to spell out this. Hitzig, for example, followed closely by Dr. Payne Smith, thinks that “stating” might be an unusual similar for “frankly,” “eg,” and/or like; even though the Vulgate and Rashi, followed by De Wette and RosenmA?ller, believe an ellipsis, and make, “it’s commonly mentioned,” or “I might state.” But much the essential normal strategy is to suppose that “saying” are a fragment for the superscription associated with prophecy, the remaining that might unintentionally put in ver. 6, and therefore we have to browse, “in addition to word-of the father came unto me inside times of Josiah the master, stating.” So J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If one set aside their wife . The debate is actually founded about legislation of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite that has separated their wife to get their again, if when you look at the looking for 3some period she was married to some other. The Jews have damaged a still even more sacred tie, not once just, but over and over repeatedly; they worshipped “gods numerous and lords numerous;” in order that they didn’t come with longer any state on Jehovah in advantage of their “covenant” along with his group. Shall the guy go back , etc.? quite, Ought he to go back? The energy in the phrase try prospective (compensation. Authorized type of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought not to be achieved”). Shall not within the next condition is quite would not . But go back once more if you ask me. So Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, and also the view may seem to-be confirmed from the invites in vers. 12, 14, 22. But as it’s clearly contradictory together with the debate of this verse, so when the verb may just as very well be the infinitive or even the vital, newest commentators make, “And thinkest thou to return for me?” (virtually, and going back to me personally! implying that most idea are inconceivable). Most likely Jeremiah is conscious a number of the Jews had been dissatisfied utilizing the spiritual condition associated with the country (comp. ver. 4).